Archived Articles
Hobby Lobby Conestoga vs. Sebelius
By Christian Medical & Dental Associations® |
It is undisputed that a new, distinct human organism comes into existence during the process of fertilization. Many drugs and devices labeled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as “contraception,” however, have post-fertilization mechanisms of action— which means that these drugs and devices work after a new human organism is created (at fertilization) but before implantation.
Elanore McCullen, et al., Petitioners, v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts- Brief
By Christian Medical & Dental Associations® |
The Massachusetts Statute and Hill v. Colorado Violate the Core of the Public Forum Doctrine That Is Rooted in the Right of Assembly. The iconic image of a sidewalk protest epitomizes our “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.
Bracing for Battle and Joining the Fray: State Legislative Campaigns Reach New Levels
By Christian Medical & Dental Associations® |
An article in the summer 2013 edition of Today's Christian Doctor that outlines CMDA's efforts in state grassroots public policy campaigns.
Korte vs. Health & Human Services Brief
By Christian Medical & Dental Associations® |
Amici—which include for-profit companies as well as national healthcare non-profit organizations, discussed below—share a common conviction: so-called “emergency contraception” can end the life of a developing human being.
Montana vs. Baxter
By Christian Medical & Dental Associations® |
Legalizing assisted suicide would have drastic public policy implications. The question whether some citizens (doctors) should be allowed to kill other citizens (patients) is a decision with profound ramifications for the safety and well being of the whole community, not least its most vulnerable members.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2